Sunday, 19 November 2017

The Forgotten War

I’m sure I’m not alone in having projects that I keep coming back to, but just never get off the ground. For me, the most prominent of these is the War of 1812.

Despite appearances to the contrary on this blog, I am, deep down at heart, a historical wargamer. My passion for the hobby was sparked by my dad’s collections of Romans and Carthaginians, both sides at Flodden, ECW Scots and his Black Brunswickers as they appeared at Waterloo. 

If you were to look at my gaming history closely, you’ll see the influences these roots. I always preferred the rank and flank of WFB to the ‘modern’ warfare of 40k. My collection of armies include my own Carthaginian and Hoplite armies. I once began an ECW project but it lost steam and the miniatures were added to my dad’s collection. And every so often I will begin furiously reading up on the War of 1812, pondering the gaming possibilities and impulse buying a few miniatures.

Why the War of 1812? What is it that draws me to this obscure and largely forgotten little conflict - an addendum to both the Napoleonic Wars and the War of Independence?

Mainly, the manageable scale (small, certainly compared to   Napoleon’s outings), the sheer variety of actions (small raids, ambushes, sieges, pitches battles), and the variety of combatants (British Redcoats, ragtag militia, and Indians!). Oh, and there’s a lack of cavalry - have I mentioned that I hate horses?

The trouble is, I never really got further than buying a few packs of miniatures from shows (and one rather random lot on eBay) because frankly, Napoleonic armies are quite intimidating. Most rulesets focus on the big battalions and even though the War of 1812 was small, the idea of painting even a couple of units of the same thing terrified me. Also there was the issue of who I’d play against.

What I needed was a combination of a few things:
  1. A fun rule set that didn’t require me to paint a lot, but still felt appropriate.
  2. An opponent who was doing something similar that could provide some motivation.
  3. The Napoleonic urge to come round again.
The first point had been tricky. I have a copy of Muskets & Tomahawks, but that would need adapting. However, about a fortnight ago I stumbled on a Beasts of War video featuring Sharp Practice 2 from Too Fat Lardies. Not only did this look fun (focusing as it does on the exploits of individual commanders) and manageable (30-40 models per side initially), it also had a War of 1812 supplement to help with army building.

As for an opponent, I remembered that Matt has both an unpainted (well, apart from 8 Riflemen and a few Light Infantry) Napoleonic British army (which is frankly ideal as the 1812 models I have are American), he also has a penchant for trying to paint more than he buys - and so was open to the idea of working on them.

That left the Napoleonic urge. As you can probably tell, it’s back.

So, my first ever Napoleonic unit are a small group from the 1st US Rifle Regiment.



These models are from Knuckleduster miniatures, and although a little rough around the edges compared to what I’ve been painting in recent times, they’ve turned out okay. I’m always amused by Napoleonic uniforms - green coats with yellow fringe, over white trousers, topped off with a plumed stovepipe shako...and this is a fairly tame uniform!



Sharp Practice requires troops to operate in groups of 6 or 8 (depending on their type) and join up with similar group to create formations like lines, columns and squares. Therefore these guys are a complete unit, although they’re currently missing an officer (or ‘big man’) to command them.

A quick scan of my ad hoc collection of War of 1812 miniatures pointed me to the ‘Scouting Force’ army list as being the closest fit. For this I will be building 6 Rifles (done), 6 Woodsmen, 16 Regulars, 8 Cavalry (I know...), and 4 Officers. Later on I have the makings of an artillery group too, and if I wish I can add the Woodland Indians I painted some time ago, although the Indians were more typically on the British side.



So there you have it. A new army started. I’m not sure how quickly they’ll come together, and I’m probably going to upset some Napoleonic purists along the way (my cavalry will be all kinds of wrong). However, I’m hoping Matt an I can at least take few models out for a spin in some skirmish rules before long as further motivation.

13 comments:

  1. They look good dude. Job well done!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cheers. I’m quite pleased with them.

      Delete
  2. VERY nice job and nice to see summat "a bit different" - the War Of 1812 is sadly overlooked by gamers.
    Looking forward to some AAR's :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hold your horses, AARs are a while away yet. :)

      The War of 1812 is starting to get a bit more recognition, I suspect mainly because there are now three or four ranges of Americans available.

      Delete
  3. i do love a Napoleonic run out. Sadly my BP Brits sit unloved on the shelf waiting for a game or two! This is a great start to an interesting project, can't wait to see whats next!

    ReplyDelete
  4. It’s been a long time since I’ve played something Napoleonic. I once ran a campaign which covered the struggle for Europe in really simple terms using a massive variety of systems.

    It culminated in a big six player game where my Brunswickers (particularly the Lancers) smashed the French right flank and saved Europe from the tyranny of Napoleon.

    Hurray for me!

    ReplyDelete
  5. They look great, and good luck on this project - painting these uniforms is one hell of a hobby killer if you aren't careful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. One of the reasons Sharp Practice appeals is the relative lack of painting compared to most Napoleonic games. Also, many of the US uniforms are distinctly less fancy than those worn in Europe.

      Delete
  6. Nicely done Kieron. :)

    My friend (and fellow blogger Rob) is also a fan of Sharp Practice and speaks highly of it. I think he tried Drums and Shakos as well but not sure he liked that as much if so.

    ReplyDelete